. . http://www.cogninova.com
../links/vilks.htm ../links/wrap.php?u=vilks.htm&t=1511541266 #z

Är avsikten med rondellhundar & muhammedteckningar
att provocera några muslimer till terrorhandlingar som sedan kan användas av Israel för att preparera världsopinionen inför sådant som gazamassakern, fortsatt landstöld, trakasserier mot palestinier i ockuperat område, långsamt mordförsök på ett folk ...
Anledningen till att Muhammed var emot avbildningar av människor var att han inte ville att människor skulle bli förmål för religiös tilledjan. En nidbild är inte lämpad för tillbedjan och borde inte vara något problem för den som förstått Muhammeds avsikt med sitt förbud.
Det står helt klart att avsikten med muhammedavbildningarna inte är något annat än att försöka provocera några muslimer till handlingar som sedan kan användas till nedsvärtning av muslimer i allmänhet.
I text på rondellhundteckningen står "Muhammed som rondellhund". Men jag tror att Muhammed i teckingen egentligen står som representant för muslimen i allmänhet. Teckningens egentliga budskap tror jag är: "Muslimer är hundar." Så egentligen anser jag att rondellhundteckningen är HETS MOT FOLKGRUPP. Ordet "hund" är ett mycket starkare okvädesord i den muslimska världen och uttrycker "underordning", "lågt stående", "förakt" och "någon det är OK att behandla illa".

"Jag vill inte betala Vilks skydd" http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=1120&artikel=5221962

Vilks om Jihad Jane: "... KONSTVERK på liv och död." http://sverigesradio.se/sida/play.aspx?ljud=4174379&t=622

Jihad Jane och rondellhunden http://sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt/265278?programid=909

Är avsikten med rondellhundar & muhammedteckningar att provocera några muslimer till terrorhandlingar som sedan kan användas av Israel för att preparera världsopinionen inför sådant som gazamassakern, fortsatt landstöld, trakasserier mot palestinier i ockuperat område, långsamt mordförsök på ett folk ... Det står helt klart att avsikten med muhammedavbildningarna inte är något annat än att försöka provocera några muslimer till handlingar som sedan kan användas till nedsvärtning av muslimer i allmänhet. I text på rondellhundteckningen står "Muhammed som rondellhund". Men jag tror att Muhammed i teckingen egentligen står som representant för muslimen i allmänhet. Teckningens egentliga budskap tror jag är: "Muslimer är hundar." Så egentligen anser jag att rondellhundteckningen är HETS MOT FOLKGRUPP. Ordet "hund" är ett mycket starkare okvädesord i den muslimska världen och uttrycker "underordning", "lågt stående", "förakt" och "någon det är OK att behandla illa". Egentligen borde muslimer inte alls reagera mot nidbilder av muhammed - men däremot reagera mot bilder som innebär förskönade av Muhanned! Anledningen till att Muhammed var emot avbildningar av människor är nämligen att han inte ville att människor skulle bli förmål för religiös tilledjan. En nidbild är inte lämpad för tillbedjan och borde inte vara något problem för den som förstått Muhammeds avsikt med sitt förbud.

Jihad Jane och rondellhunden http://sverigesradio.se/sida/avsnitt/265278?programid=909#comments

Meet Tonik, the Dog with a Human Face http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTO-V76kdSk

Using drawings in order to upset muslims has a lot more to do with politics than free speech.

Fatal shooting at Charlie Hebdo HQ in Paris LIVE UPDATES http://rt.com/news/220523-deadly-attack-french-newspaper/

How about the (ultimate palestinian) victims of the Muhammad cartoonists? Stand with them?

#JeSuisCharlie: World stands with Charlie Hebdo victims http://rt.com/news/220659-support-charlie-hedbo-world/

muhammed-cartoons were meant to ultimatimately lead to muslims being killed for their reaction to them

muhammed-cartoons were meant to ultimatimately lead to muslims being killed for muslim reactions to the drawings

muhammed-cartoons were meant to ultimately lead to muslims being killed for muslim reactions to the drawings

Very interesting narrative about a fake movie. This guy makes a trailer about all of the anti-Muslim propaganda about Muhammed. The trailer is launched on Youtube, which goes viral and causes massive riots across Africa and Asia. The riots act act as a screen for a raid against the American embassy (*coughCIAHideoutcough*) in Benghazi. Golly - no one could see THAT coming. The more we torment these people (OUR victims), the more we show ourselves to be truly evil. This attack is the fault of the Americans and the Western world. This is NOT 'terrorism' - its blow-back.

So first, you have your homeland invaded, bombed and occupied. Then, virtually all of the countries of your people are either invaded/bombed, colonized by fascist genocidal maniacs, or run by puppet dictators owned by the same people who are doing the invading/bombing. You have to leave. There's no home, no food, no water, no clothes - you have to move to another land. Because all the nations around you are suffering from the same plight that your homeland is, you end up having to flee THOUSANDS of miles away. You end up in a nation with different weather, different language, different religion, different customs ... and most of the people there hate you simply because you were forced to flee your homeland. The place you end up in is an ally of the people who invaded/bombed your homeland. They support the colonialists who are slaughtering the people in your neighbor-nation. Then they decide that it would be funny to write cartoons about your suffering. See how long you go before you want to kill everyone in your path. Are you WHITE? You are the most vicious, heartless, brutal sub-human filth on the planet. Yes, I'm white too. That's part of the reason why I understand you so well.

Did U.S. really wanted the people in Syria to have a better situation? Excuse me, I mean Ukraine, ehh Lybia ...Iraq

The 4 are just another sacrifice from the western war mongers. They sacrifice more than 200 from the MH17 in Donbas and they will continue till you Europeans start asking for real justice to all. More than 4000 civilians have been killed in Donbas and who cares in the EU/USA? Your government keep on sending weapons for more to be killed. I am worried of the people of Donbas for I am in Ukraine, not worried for people whose government are responsible for the death of hundred of thousand of people over the world. People will keep dying till when the world will start seeing justice no matter the passport you hold.

Cartoonists might be kind of warriors as well as bloggers might ... and fell as soldiers. The pencil is a sword.

Ann Kennedy +2 I never thought about it that way. Thank you for helping me see another point of view Ingvar.

The pencil is a sword - both when it writes and draws. Cartoonists might be kind of warriors as well as bloggers might ... and fell as soldiers.

Muhammad-drawings was provocations that ultimatele led to the Gaza-massacre - by making it possble in the context of world opinion.

Muhammad-drawings was PROVOCATIONS that ultimately led to the Gaza-massacre - by making it possble in the context of world opinion. Was it planned? Mohahammad drawings was NOT ABOUT FREE SPEECH. By the way: Hitler spoke a lot. Speeking can kill.

Muhammad-drawings was only formally about Muhammad. Those drawings were in reality about MUSLIMS, and Muhammad was just a symbol standing for "muslim". When mr Vilks (in Sweden) drew his "Muhammad-dog" he therefore wrote "Muhammad" on the drawing to avoid being sued for attacking a group of people (I think). A person drawing a shameful picture of a specific jew would be accused of attacking all jews.

Pride is the weak point of arabs. Therefore provocations on them aims on pride. To have them do things that "justify " them being killed. (I think something similar for instance goes for japanese people who are said to rather kill themselves if having lost their honour.)

Honour is the weak point of arabs. Therefore provocations on them aims on honour. To have them do things that "justify " them being killed. (I think something similar for instance goes for japanese people who are said to rather kill themselves if having lost their honour.)

Honour is the weak point of arabs. Therefore provocations on them aims on attacking their honour. To have them do things that "justify " them being killed. (I think something similar for instance goes for japanese people who are said to rather kill themselves if having lost their honour.)

If I say something to a driver that makes him lose control over his car and is killed, is that a good example off free speech?

If I say something to a driver that makes him lose control over his car and is killed, is that a good example off free speech? If I say something to an arab that makes him attack somebody so he is killed himself, is that a good example off free speech?

If I move a red piece of cloth in front of a bull ...

http://www.taylormarsh.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/jesus-couv.jpg

If I say something to a driver that makes him lose control over his car and is killed, is that a good example off free speech? If I say something to an arab that makes him attack somebody so he is killed himself, is that a good example off free speech? If I move a red piece of cloth in front of a bull ...

Charlie Hebdo have had a cover making joke of the birth of Jesus. But real christians does not become aggressive about that because Jesus told them to instead "turn their other cheek to..." and those who use swords will be destoyed by swords. (i don't know if there are any covers making jokes about judaism. ... might depend on the cartoonists ...)

By "turning the other cheek to..." one makes a joke of the aggressor, and therefore he might stop. Might work in an otherwise hopeless situation ...

Paris manhunt: 3 gunmen at large, 12 shot dead at Charlie Hebdo offices http://rt.com/news/220603-manhunt-paris-charlie-hebdo/

By "turning the other cheek to..." one shows that one is not aggressive and starves his hunting instinct, and therefore he might stop. Might work in an otherwise hopeless situation ...

By "turning the other cheek to..." one shows that one is not aggressive and depletes his hunting instinct, and therefore he might stop. Might work when one really is a underdog ... (By the way: I think some dogs practice the same.)

Some people being robbed come better out by not making the robber angry. It called SELF-CONTROL. No-one else should be able to upset you in situatios you arre not gained by being upset.

Jesus said to his followers that they should not let themselves be provoked "Turn the other cheek to..." "Those who use swords will be destroyed by swords." "The humble ones will rule the world"

Jesus said to his followers that they should not let themselves become provoked "Turn the other cheek to..." "Those who use swords will be destroyed by swords." "The humble ones will rule the world"

#a
http://www.cogninova.com